Monday, August 01, 2016

Mark of the Beast, Perhaps?

The other day I received in my e-mail box an e-mail from the Social Security Administration, telling me that in order to log into my "My Social Security" account--not that I need to, I am already on Social Security, but still--I needed not only a user name and password, but now I need a special code that can only be sent to me by "cell phone with text." Some "SMS" crap! So I e-mailed Social Security telling them that I DO NOT HAVE, NOR WANT TO HAVE, A CELL PHONE, WITH OR WITHOUT TEXT MESSAGING!

For obvious reasons, the main one being that anyone with a cell phone can be spied on much more easily by the criminal psychopathic elite-led government than if one did not have a cell phone with text, I do not want to have a cell phone on me.

Another reason is I live in a rural remote area where cell service does not exist unless you drive about 8 miles toward the entrance of the subdivision I live in.

A third reason is any cell service out here is spotty, even if you do have it at your house.

So then, this is what the government is telling, for the most part, folks who want to apply for Social Security...and oh yeah, Medicare as well (I am NOT on Medicare yet! I am NOT 65 yet!)...MUST have a cell phone with text, so they can "text" you the "SMS" code which you then plug in with your username and password to reach your "My Social Security" account.

Now before I get to the gist of my post, let me say that this means that old folks who don't even have a computer, or anyone that does not even have internet, can NO LONGER APPLY FOR SOCIAL SECURITY OR MEDICARE without a good deal of inconvenience! Let's say you are 70 or older, and you have worked most of your life, and decided a few years ago to wait until you turn 70 or older before you applied for benefits so that your benefit is higher per month. Well, guess what? If you don't have a cell phone with text, you cannot apply for Social Security unless you live in a big city that has a Social Security office? So what if you live in a rural remote area and have to drive three hours, just to apply for Social Security or Medicare? Because many rural remote areas do not have cell service!

Now, the gist. Supposedly Obama "passed a law"...you know, "Executive Order"...that says that "due to heightened security risks" means that in order to have a "My Social Security" account--since, of course, the Social Security Administration can't stop hackers to save its life! Than what the hell good is the NSA? Homeland Security? FBI?--one MUST have a cell phone with text! So, as with ObamaCare and other "laws" designed to enslave us, either this came about because of diktat by cell phone companies like Verizon (and, out here, the ONLY company that works is Verizon!) or ATT or T-Mobile who can't stand the fact that they are not making trillions in profit trying to sell new cell phones that can text...believe it or not, many people still use their old "non-text" cell phones! And God forbid folks should want to keep their old phones...it's as if the company is pulling an ObamaCare Obama--"if you like your cell phone, you can keep your cell phone"--well, now you CAN'T! YOU MUST GET A CELL PHONE WITH TEXT, SLAVE!!!

So, either this is just another oligarch-profit meme, or something a lot more sinister: BEING FORCED TO HAVE A CELL PHONE WITH TEXT IS JUST ANOTHER "INCREMENTAL" STEP IN FORCING ONE INTO THE BELOVED SATANIC "NEW WORLD ORDER"!

Where, if you want a to e-mail (and Yahoo, with their SMS bullcrap they want you to enter "for security reasons", but at least now it is voluntary! Well let's see how long that lasts!), or even get on the Internet at all, you will need a cell phone with text to get your SMS code! Are we not headed toward this scenario?

So, could having a cell phone with text, and getting your SMS code through text, be the Mark of the Beast? Or, just the "incremental" part of it?

For verification that what I am writing is true, visit: http://www.ssa.gov

Wednesday, July 06, 2016

Romans 13 "101"... There Really Is Light At the End of the Dark "Hillary Broke the Law" Tunnel

First we have minions of the criminal psychos telling us "little people" how stupid we are for even thinking we have any rights at all, after the Brexit vote which the elites just might regret ignoring...of course, they are too stupid to keep ignoring it, so they will just keep ignoring it!

Note: That's right folks! I truly think the criminal psychopathic elites are not only TRULY the real "useless eaters" (for instance, the early 20th century Empress Dowager of early 20th century China, whose fingernails were so long she couldn't even hope to wipe her own butt, let alone her own vaginal area after pee-ing, and whose feet were so tightly bound in that old Chinese ritual of feet-binding of baby girls of the aristocracy so that when they reached the age of five they had to be carried in litters everywhere because by then thy couldn't even walk!), but are also TRULY the real idiots of this world...heck a guy or gal with an IQ of a low-grade moron is smarter than, say, James "the elites should revolt against the masses" Traub, who thinks only bankster/oligarchs should vote (thereby proving he's already a complete idiot! They are ALREADY the only people whose votes count...because they "vote: with their wallets if you know what I mean...)

Memo to idiot Traub: the elites revolted against the masses, say, back in roughly 2000 BC, when (plus or minus a hundred years or so) Nimrod, a "mighty man/gibborhim" ordered the building of the Tower of Babel so he could summon another set of fallen angels to Earth, that is, until God foiled his plot. Now why, Mr. Stupid, would the elites have to revolt again? What rock did you just crawl out from under? Stonehenge?

But in a way Traub is right: us "little people" really should not bother to go to the ballot box, when there is a more effective box to go to...you know the box I mean. But don't actually use it unless defending yourself...all that is required is to use it in such a way so as to put these psychos on trial, find them guilty, then send them to a place where penguins will not be allowed to wipe their butts, nor will these wonderful creatures of God be able to be eaten by the aforementioned psychos.

And Hillary Clinton won't even be allowed to wear penguin-droppings in her hair!

Well, now that I have said that, someone reading this is going to want to remind me that these psychos, aka "our rulers", must be obeyed....and folks, instead of the "if Obama told you to jump off a 1,000-foot cliff, would you do it?" response that I would normally use, let me instead provide a lesson--again--on the true meaning of Romans 13.  I'll call it "Romans 13-101" if you will...

"Let  EVERY SOUL (yes, folks, every soul--and yes, this includes the criminal psycho elites whom some say have no souls since they pulled a Kanye "I sold my soul to the devil..." West at some point) be SUBJECT unto the higher powers (and, no, the Rothschilds are NOT the higher powers, okay?). For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God." Thus says verse one of Romans 13. But the problem appears to be that too many Christians believe that the Rothschilds or the Clintons or the Obamas, or the Putins or the Chinese Communist Party or Kim Jong Un or the various bankster-oligarchs are the "powers that be" and thus must be obeyed.

But, of course, the Bible has the solution to this supposed conundrum: there is a "ready reference" in the KJV authorized version that refers to Acts 5:29, which says (replying to a question brought by the High priest, likely a Pharisee, about Peter and other apostles "teaching in" Christ's name), "Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, 'We ought to obey God rather than men."

So, folks, who are the "higher powers" we must obey? GOD! And the other "higher powers", that is, God's own minions such as His various angels, the so-called "Principalities and Powers" on God's side (not Satan's, okay?), as well as His Son, Jesus Christ, and His Holy Spirit.

PERIOD! End of story!

And need I remind Christians of the lesson in Job chapter 2, when Satan, yes, Satan, DOES THE WILL OF GOD by doing to Job ONLY what God allows him to do, and no more?

But, some might say, doesn't that mean that, since (for one reason or another related to possibly God's wrath against the United States of America for ABANDONING HIM for so long, for so many times!) psychos like Obama (and then either Hillary--more likely than Trump, or the Donald himself) is "our" President, then he needs to be obeyed? Didn't God put him there? Right?

Now consider the "Obama orders me to jump off a 1,000 foot cliff" thus committing the sin of suicide, or, say, by signing up for ObamaCare you are letting your ObamaCare payments pay for abominations like abortions and sex changes...folks you do realize that if you are paying for ObamaCare (or if you are getting all care for free in subsidies) YOU ARE SUPPORTING ABORTION AND SEX CHANGES! In a country where YOU DO NOT HAVE TO BUY OBAMACARE! You can, instead, either pay the "tax" (which though odious is less than paying for ObamaCare), or you can join a Christian Healthshare Ministry!

Folks, do you really think I am going to buy into the "I am forced to disobey God by supporting abortions" with my ObamaCare payments" because "the law" aka Obama forces me to, even though I am not forced to? Folks! If you disobey God by financially supporting abortions or sex changes because you think you are obeying "the powers that be" such as Obama or the entire lawless United States government, then you are VIOLATING Romans 13!

PERIOD! End of Story!

Later on in Romans 13, Paul refers to a minister of God....in verse 4 it says, "For he (the "ruler" referred to in verse one...folks notice the "he" here...this automatically disqualifies Hillary as a "ruler"! And I don't give a crap WHAT she "identifies as"!) is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil. (verse 5) Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake." (Note: the New Revised Standard Version uses the word "magistrate" instead of "minister"...by swapping words like this, the NRSV and other versions confuse the reader into thinking that some government official, no matter how psychopathic, must be obeyed!)

And who is this "he" that must be obeyed? Why, God, and Christ, and the Holy Spirit, of course!

Then you have verses 6 and 7 that talk about "taxes" or "tributes"...these verses even lead to even more confusion. These "taxes" or "tributes" are paid to God's ministers (not magistrates, okay?). The verses are not absolutely clear about if these ministers are Church ministers or elders, but likely that is what is meant. As for taxes, they should be paid IF taxes are legally owed...but here's the thing about taxes in the US: not only does the IRS STILL claim that income taxes are voluntary, but that legally, only those who work in some capacity for the government owe taxes! If you work for Washington DC, you owe taxes, that is (even if you only work part time or per diem). Thus, if you work for a private company and pay taxes, one, your employer is ignorant of the law when your employer deducts payroll taxes, and, two, you are doing so voluntarily! This goer double for independent contractors with their 1099-MISC taxes! Literally!

Now, have I explained myself and Romans 13 enough?

But here is where there is light at the end of the dark tunnel, regardless of Hillary's fate: that FBI Director James Comey totally disregarded not only US law but common sense in letting Hillary walk free from treason (selling military and other national security secrets to China, ISIS, the Muslim Brotherhood...yes, that's what Doug Hagmann said on his podcast with Dave Hodges' "Common Sense Show"...how's that for an Israel-firster selling secrets to an org, as well as getting funding from this org, that supports Hamas!...and more) to chicanery with her bogus Clinton Foundations and Initiatives, and that even some in the liberal media are astounded and even horrified by this, not to mention Judge Janine's rants and those of FOX and others, it can be seen that, FINALLY, the American people now have NO EXCUSES for not utterly distrusting the government as well as the media, and now have NO EXCUSES for not concluding the United States of America is a LAWLESS nation that will soon see the complete and utter WRATH OF GOD upon it UNLESS We the People repent and return to the WORD OF GOD!

PERIOD! End of Story!




Wednesday, June 22, 2016

On "God Will Have All Mankind To Be Saved"

In Chapter 2 of 1 Timothy is the following (referred to at the masthead of this site) after saying that all in authority should be prayed for and such:

Verse 3: "For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior; (Verse 4) Who will have all men to be saved (other Bibles use the word "mankind", so women are not left out, okay?), and to come unto the knowledge of the truth, (verse 5) For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; (verse 6) Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time."

Then in Philippians Chapter 2 we read referring to Christ, starting with verse 9 (note the black star in the KJV meaning a fulfilled prophecy) "Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him,, and given him a name which is above every other name: (verse 10) That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; (verse 11) And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father (and notice the white star indicating a prophecy that had yet to be fulfilled at the time of the writing of the verse).

But does this mean all mankind actually will be saved? God "would" have all mankind to be saved is stating that "would" means "wishes" or "wants" all mankind to be saved.

But in various places in the Bible (Romans Chapter 2, or Galatians Chapter 3, or other places....many other places!) is clearly stated that Jesus is the Way, Truth, Life, and that no one comes to the Father except through Him. 1 John 2:22 clearly states that one who denies Jesus is the Christ denieth the Father and the Son and is a liar, an anti-Christ, while verse 23 clearly states one who has NOT the Son has NOT the Father, but one who has the Son has the Father also. Since Christ is our Advocate in the face of our adversary Satan at Judgment, why would one want to deny Christ as the Son?

Now I bring up the issue of "God would have all mankind to be saved" for a couple of reasons:

1. Many Christians (and I daresay most Jews) believe that all Jews will be saved, regardless of whether or not they accept Christ as Savior, which is what John Hagee and others preach because the Jews are, say, "the apple of God's eye" and other reasons. That at some point even those who hate Christ--you know, like Saul of Tarsus did before Christ appeared to him and then he becomes the Apostle Paul--either at the moment of His coming or right before or right after, will accept Christ as Savior simply because "God will write" Christ "onto their hearts." Refer to Ezekiel Chapter 36, where it says in verse 26, "A new heart I will give you, and a new spirit will I put within you."

But does this refer to the time frame of the present, while a state called Israel exists, a state that clearly does NOT have the spirit of Christ among most of its residents (Jewish or "Arab"). So how can Hagee or anyone else claim that Christ or no-Christ, all Jews will be saved? Or does this refer to the future at the second coming of Christ where one minute Jew hates Christ but then Christ comes and he then loves Christ? Or does this refer to when Christ came back in the year 4 BC, and then His Ministry, where thousands of Jews accepted Christ, including Paul? Or, as some believe, all Jews--in fact, all mankind, becomes saved through repentance at Judgment time? Having been a frequent visitor to L. Ray Smith's Bible-Truth site (which may be down now--he died several years ago) where they preached this "universal reconciliation" doctrine, I used to believe this.

But it is clear, only belief in Christ as Savior will have one saved. This is what the Bible says in many places. But the thing is, there might be a time around judgment when God and Christ give every single human a final chance to accept Christ, and this be saved. I just do not know when this event could take place.

2. If the first point holds water, then another issue arises: given that many humans today either are being "enhanced" with non-human parts (for health reasons, for instance hearts from animals), or desire to be enhanced so that they can maybe live forever (and this escape God's Wrath)--that is, the transhumanist movement beloved by the wealthy elites like Kurzweil and others--and have their DNA changed--supposedly this is what Nimrod did some years after Noah's flood when he built Babylon on the Plains of Shinar, becoming a "mighty man" or "gibborhim" in Hebrew, and even more profound DNA changes happened before the Flood beginning with the descending of the Fallen Angels mating with the "daughters of men" in Genesis Chapter 6 to produce "giants" or "nephilim" in Hebrew, and, after (according to Rob Skiba) the nephilim killed each other off infront of their Angel-Human parents, their DNA was still used to produce hybrid offspring that was not fully human (and the Book of Enoch confirms the killing off of the giants who were descended from the Angels, as well as the confining of these fallen Angels to the underworld called Tartarus--in the Book of Revelation they are unleashed). Genesis 6 confirms that nearly all human DNA was corrupted somehow, except for Noah and his three sons (but according to Skiba, their wives may have been corrupted, and I have no doubt that Ham's wife had to have been...his son Cush begat Nimrod who knew about the arcane knowledge to make himself a "mighty man" and the Titans of ancient Greece are also descended from Ham through Mizrahim, and the Rephahim the Israelites saw when they went to conquer Canaan were also descended from ham through Canaan (and remember the Philistine Goliath).

My point is this: what with transhumanism, other bodily enhancements deemed necessary by doctors and others, and possible genetic modification of human DNA (heck they use it on plants and animals---why not humans?) supposedly to "get rid of Downs Syndrome" and other pretexts to change human DNA without telling anyone about it, plus the so-called "designer babies" that rich folks want, who is to say that everyone on planet Earth will indeed be fully human in the times before the second coming of Christ, which Christ Himself refers to as the "Days of Noah"?

There are those who think anyone with any human DNA changes or "enhancements" which make the person NOT fully human will be denied a chance to be saved, at whatever point the chance arrives--and these who make these claims may be right.

That leads to the possibility that these changes could constitute the "mark of the Beast" for those who "accept" these changes. And if folks do NOT accept these changes?

We shall see, but as Christ even said, for the sake of the elect, the time of trouble will be shortened, because if not shortened, no one would survive this period.